SOLUTIONS · IN-HOUSE & CORPORATE IP

Give your IP team more capacity, and more control.

Give your IP team more capacity, and more control.

Inventor documents go in. Analyzed, drafted, and reviewed applications come out. Decide earlier what’s worth filing, and put your counsel’s time into claim strategy and inventor alignment.

SOC 2 certified. Attorney-controlled. Never used to train AI models.

YOUR PROGRAM, YOUR STANDARD

Why corporate IP teams choose Paximal

Why corporate IP teams choose Paximal

Why corporate IP teams choose Paximal

File more, standardize quality, and work in step with your counsel.

Decide before you draft.

Run novelty, detectability, and business value analyses on any disclosure (prosecution analysis coming soon), so filing decisions rest on evidence and your team’s time goes to the inventions worth pursuing.

Invention to draft, in one place.

Capture, interview, draft, and review in a single matter, with inventors contributing at their own stages. Every disclosure, answer, and revision stays attached to the matter, so nothing is lost between handoffs.

A shared workflow with your counsel.

In-house or outside counsel, everyone works from the same record: a proofread draft, a redline against the last revision, and the alignment history behind every decision. Reviewers keep their own workflow, and Paximal applies their feedback as a new tracked revision.

Counsel who start from a stronger draft.

Your outside counsel receives proofread applications with the decisions already recorded, so their time goes to claim strategy and refinement instead of reconstructing what was decided.

PROOF

Speed is easy. Speed with quality shows up in the file wrapper.

Speed is easy. Speed with quality shows up in the file wrapper.

~80% allowed within one Office action

About 10% were allowed on first action, and about 70% after a single Office action. This is Born Strong™ in the file wrapper.

10

%

first-action allowance

70

%

allowed after one Office action

~80% of prior art rejections overcome with targeted amendments

About 65% of applications received a §102/§103 rejection at first action. Of those, roughly 80% were traversed with targeted claim amendments, often clarifying language or promoting allowable dependent matter.

65

%

§102/§103 prior art at first action

80

%

traversed via targeted amendments

0% §112(a) enablement rejections · ~4 hrs average prep

No enablement rejections across the cohort. Only about 20% received minor §112(b) clarifications, all promptly resolved. Average prep from inventor materials to filing-ready is about 4 hours, including alignment and final review. Typical manual drafting takes 20 to 30 hours.

0

%

§112(a) enablement rejections

4

hrs

average prep, inventor materials to filing-ready

~80% allowed within one Office action

About 10% were allowed on first action, and about 70% after a single Office action. This is Born Strong™ in the file wrapper.

10

%

first-action allowance

70

%

allowed after one Office action

~80% of prior art rejections overcome with targeted amendments

About 65% of applications received a §102/§103 rejection at first action. Of those, roughly 80% were traversed with targeted claim amendments, often clarifying language or promoting allowable dependent matter.

65

%

§102/§103 prior art at first action

80

%

traversed via targeted amendments

0% §112(a) enablement rejections · ~4 hrs average prep

No enablement rejections across the cohort. Only about 20% received minor §112(b) clarifications, all promptly resolved. Average prep from inventor materials to filing-ready is about 4 hours, including alignment and final review. Typical manual drafting takes 20 to 30 hours.

0

%

§112(a) enablement rejections

4

hrs

average prep, inventor materials to filing-ready

~80% allowed within one Office action

About 10% were allowed on first action, and about 70% after a single Office action. This is Born Strong™ in the file wrapper.

10

%

first-action allowance

70

%

allowed after one Office action

~80% of prior art rejections overcome with targeted amendments

About 65% of applications received a §102/§103 rejection at first action. Of those, roughly 80% were traversed with targeted claim amendments, often clarifying language or promoting allowable dependent matter.

65

%

§102/§103 prior art at first action

80

%

traversed via targeted amendments

0% §112(a) enablement rejections · ~4 hrs average prep

No enablement rejections across the cohort. Only about 20% received minor §112(b) clarifications, all promptly resolved. Average prep from inventor materials to filing-ready is about 4 hours, including alignment and final review. Typical manual drafting takes 20 to 30 hours.

0

%

§112(a) enablement rejections

4

hrs

average prep, inventor materials to filing-ready

Case Study 01 — Accelerated patent applications prosecuted to allowance at the USPTO

The results above come from a cohort of applications drafted by Paximal. Read the full analysis.

Read the analysis

How RapidSOS’s in-house team drafts more patents, with the quality it expects.

Read the full story behind the results — we’ll email you the PDF.

Get the case study

WORKFLOW

Fast drafting. Professional control.

From invention documents to filing-ready, with your counsel directing every decision.

01

CAPTURE & DISCLOSE

Upload what your inventors have: invention disclosures, specs, design docs, source excerpts, diagrams, decks, lab notes. Paximal can turn them into a formal IDF, asking at checkpoints rather than guessing.

02

ANALYZE

Optional

Run any of three analyses before you draft: Novelty (prior art, your references or Paximal’s), Detectability, and Business Value for a named company. Prosecution Analysis (with a Juristat subscription) is coming soon. Each returns a report you can attach to the draft or skip.

03

DRAFT & REVIEW

Paximal drafts the full application with figures and a rapid-review summary, pausing for your direction on the target for protection, claims, and figures. Review it yourself, then upload the version your inventors or outside counsel have reviewed, and Paximal applies the feedback. Every pass is a tracked revision.

04

FILE

Coming next

Paximal assembles the filing package from the approved draft. Inventor and attorney approve and sign with S-signatures, and the package is ready for your filing and docketing workflow. These stages are coming next, in the app and through MCP like the rest of the flow.

Run it in the app, or drive every stage from your assistant through MCP.

WHAT TEAMS SAY

“Paximal lets us move faster on first drafts without giving up the attorney judgment our portfolio depends on.”

“Paximal lets us move faster on first drafts without giving up the attorney judgment our portfolio depends on.”

user pic

Will Piggott, Esq., IP Counsel, RapidSOS

Will Piggott, Esq., IP Counsel, RapidSOS

FAQS

Frequently Asked Questions

Frequently Asked Questions

Frequently Asked Questions

Quick answers for patent teams evaluating Paximal.

Want to see it on your disclosures?

Schedule a call to review your use case and see how Patent Flow™ takes a disclosure to a filing-ready application.

How does Paximal fit a high-volume filing program?

Built for throughput. Every disclosure goes through the same checkpoints, the analyses help you decide what’s worth filing, drafting and proofreading run on Paximal, and your team acts at the decision points.

How does Paximal fit a high-volume filing program?

Built for throughput. Every disclosure goes through the same checkpoints, the analyses help you decide what’s worth filing, drafting and proofreading run on Paximal, and your team acts at the decision points.

Does Paximal replace our attorneys?

No. Every decision stays with your counsel, and Paximal pauses at checkpoints to ask for their direction.

Which technologies does it cover?

Software, AI/ML, telecom, semiconductors, consumer electronics, automotive, industrial/robotics, energy, aerospace & defense, medical devices, fintech, and others.

Which technologies does it cover?

Can we customize it to our standards?

Yes. Custom drafting agents capture your templates and best practices, so quality stays consistent across your team.

Can we customize it to our standards?

How does Paximal work with our outside counsel?

It gives everyone the same record. Counsel can start from a proofread draft with the alignment history and recorded decisions, so their time goes to claim strategy and refinement. If you draft in-house, you can bring counsel in at review. Either way, every decision stays with your attorneys.

How does Paximal work with our outside counsel?

Can we connect Paximal to our systems?

Yes. The MCP server lets your internal assistants and agents create matters, run stages, answer checkpoints, and pull documents under your permissions. Your docketing, intake, or document management systems can connect through your own integration.

Can we connect Paximal to our systems?

What about security?

Your work stays under your counsel’s control. Paximal is SOC 2 certified, stores and processes all data in the U.S., never uses your materials to train AI models, and never shares them with third parties. The full security posture is on our security page.

What about security?

GET STARTED

Ready to see it on your filing pipeline?

Schedule a demo and watch a disclosure move from invention documents to a filing-ready application.

info@paximal.com