SOLUTIONS · LAW FIRMS

More filings through your bench. Better strategy on every one.

More filings through your bench. Better strategy on every one.

Patent Flow™ takes each matter from invention documents to a reviewed, proofread, filing-ready application. Your associates and patent agents spend their time on claim strategy and alignment, and your partners review stronger first drafts.

SOC 2 certified. Attorney-controlled. Never used to train AI models.

MORE MATTERS, SAME BENCH

Why firms choose Paximal

Why firms choose Paximal

More throughput, consistency across drafters, and more time for claim strategy, without thinning quality.

More throughput, same team.

Analyses, drafting, proofreading, and feedback application run on Paximal. Associates and patent agents act at the stages that need their judgment, and put the time they get back into claim strategy and alignment.

Consistency across drafters.

Every drafter works from the same checkpoints, and partners know where review happens on every matter. Consistency becomes a property of the system, not of the individual.

Partner review, not rewrite.

Drafts arrive proofread, with a redline against the last revision and the alignment history that explains every choice. Review starts at claim posture.

PROOF

Speed is easy. Speed with quality shows up in the file wrapper.

Speed is easy. Speed with quality shows up in the file wrapper.

~80% allowed within one Office action

About 10% were allowed on first action, and about 70% after a single Office action. This is Born Strong™ in the file wrapper.

10

%

first-action allowance

70

%

allowed after one Office action

~80% of prior art rejections overcome with targeted amendments

About 65% of applications received a §102/§103 rejection at first action. Of those, roughly 80% were traversed with targeted claim amendments, often clarifying language or promoting allowable dependent matter.

65

%

§102/§103 prior art at first action

80

%

traversed via targeted amendments

0% §112(a) enablement rejections · ~4 hrs average prep

No enablement rejections across the cohort. Only about 20% received minor §112(b) clarifications, all promptly resolved. Average prep from inventor materials to filing-ready is about 4 hours, including alignment and final review. Typical manual drafting takes 20 to 30 hours.

0

%

§112(a) enablement rejections

4

hrs

average prep, inventor materials to filing-ready

~80% allowed within one Office action

About 10% were allowed on first action, and about 70% after a single Office action. This is Born Strong™ in the file wrapper.

10

%

first-action allowance

70

%

allowed after one Office action

~80% of prior art rejections overcome with targeted amendments

About 65% of applications received a §102/§103 rejection at first action. Of those, roughly 80% were traversed with targeted claim amendments, often clarifying language or promoting allowable dependent matter.

65

%

§102/§103 prior art at first action

80

%

traversed via targeted amendments

0% §112(a) enablement rejections · ~4 hrs average prep

No enablement rejections across the cohort. Only about 20% received minor §112(b) clarifications, all promptly resolved. Average prep from inventor materials to filing-ready is about 4 hours, including alignment and final review. Typical manual drafting takes 20 to 30 hours.

0

%

§112(a) enablement rejections

4

hrs

average prep, inventor materials to filing-ready

~80% allowed within one Office action

About 10% were allowed on first action, and about 70% after a single Office action. This is Born Strong™ in the file wrapper.

10

%

first-action allowance

70

%

allowed after one Office action

~80% of prior art rejections overcome with targeted amendments

About 65% of applications received a §102/§103 rejection at first action. Of those, roughly 80% were traversed with targeted claim amendments, often clarifying language or promoting allowable dependent matter.

65

%

§102/§103 prior art at first action

80

%

traversed via targeted amendments

0% §112(a) enablement rejections · ~4 hrs average prep

No enablement rejections across the cohort. Only about 20% received minor §112(b) clarifications, all promptly resolved. Average prep from inventor materials to filing-ready is about 4 hours, including alignment and final review. Typical manual drafting takes 20 to 30 hours.

0

%

§112(a) enablement rejections

4

hrs

average prep, inventor materials to filing-ready

Case Study 01 — Accelerated patent applications prosecuted to allowance at the USPTO

The results above come from a cohort of applications drafted by Paximal. Read the full analysis.

Read the analysis

Case Study 02 — How RapidSOS’s in-house team drafts more patents, with the quality it expects.

Read the full story behind the results — we’ll email you the PDF.

Get the case study

WORKFLOW

Fast drafting. Professional control.

From invention documents to filing-ready, with your attorneys directing every decision.

01

CAPTURE & DISCLOSE

Upload what you have: invention disclosures, specs, design docs, source excerpts, diagrams, decks, lab notes. Paximal can turn them into a formal IDF, asking you at checkpoints rather than guessing.

02

ANALYZE

Optional

Run any of three analyses before you draft: Novelty (prior art, your references or Paximal’s), Detectability, and Business Value for a named company. Prosecution Analysis (with a Juristat subscription) is coming soon. Each returns a report you can attach to the draft or skip.

03

DRAFT & REVIEW

Paximal drafts the full application with figures and a rapid-review summary, pausing for your direction on the target for protection, claims, and figures. Review it yourself, then upload the version your client or inventor has reviewed, and Paximal applies the feedback. Every pass is a tracked revision.

04

FILE

Coming next

Paximal assembles the filing package from the approved draft. Inventor and attorney approve and sign with S-signatures, and the package is ready for your filing and docketing workflow. These stages are coming next, in the app and through MCP like the rest of the flow.

Run it in the app, or drive every stage from your assistant through MCP.

WHAT CLIENTS SAY

“…the difference with Paximal shows up in the draft itself. The structure holds, the language is precise, and the application reads like it was built by someone who understands patent prosecution. That’s not something you get from a generic AI solution.”

user pic

Ted Wood, Esq., Founder & Managing Partner, Wood IP LLC

FAQS

Frequently Asked Questions

Frequently Asked Questions

Frequently Asked Questions

Quick answers for patent teams evaluating Paximal.

Want to see it on your matter?

Want to see it on your matter?

Schedule a call to review your use case and see how Patent Flow™ takes a matter from invention documents to a filing-ready application.

Will this fit our review workflow?

Yes. Attorney and inventor review are built into the flow, with feedback recorded against a specific revision. There are no plug-ins to install, and the MCP server lets you work from your own tools if you want to.

Will this fit our review workflow?

Yes. Attorney and inventor review are built into the flow, with feedback recorded against a specific revision. There are no plug-ins to install, and the MCP server lets you work from your own tools if you want to.

Does it work across our practice groups?

Paximal handles software, AI/ML, electrical, mechanical, electromechanical, telecom, and medical device matters, with industry-specific framing for each.

Does it work across our practice groups?

Can we encode our firm’s templates and style?

Yes. Custom drafting agents capture your firm’s templates and style, so quality stays consistent across every drafter.

Can we encode our firm’s templates and style?

How fast can we pilot?

Quickly. Onboarding takes about an hour, and your first matter can go through the full flow that afternoon.

How fast can we pilot?

What does MCP mean for a firm?

Your assistants and internal agents can create matters, start stages, answer checkpoints, and retrieve files under your users’ permissions. Your document management or docketing system can connect through your own integration.

What does MCP mean for a firm?

What about security and confidentiality?

Your work stays under your attorneys’ control. Paximal is SOC 2 certified, stores and processes all data in the U.S., never uses your materials to train AI models, and never shares them with third parties. The full security posture is on our security page.

What about security and confidentiality?

Does Paximal replace the attorney?

No. Every decision stays with your attorneys, and Paximal pauses at checkpoints to ask for their direction.

GET STARTED

Ready for patent applications Born Strong™?

Schedule a demo and watch a matter go from invention disclosure to filing-ready application.

info@paximal.com